Narayan I dunno folks. I beg to differ on the ovelarl usage stats. Opera has a far larger share than is represented in those stats.Chrome although offering a few cool toys, hasn't really done anything that isn't already being done at least as well or better by other browsers.Memory usage for Chrome compared to Opera 9.52 was a bit slimmer, but when compared side by side in page load times, Chrome fails badly.Rendering is still pretty buggy. More research, more developement is needed before I worry about making my site compatible with what looks to be a fly-by-night offering. (It took months and and my site still isn't 100% x-browser compliant between IE, FF and Opera. And nevermind validating my pages. They weren't designed that way hahahahaha)Google seems to be biting off way more than hey can chew as of late.

Dave FireFox users are strong, FF will out beat all brroesws just because of its flexibility, and thousands of add ons. FireFox even got into the Guinness world records for download day for FF3. Yes I have to admit I did download Chrome, but only for cross-browser issues (Codes that look right in FireFox, Internet Explore, Opera and Safari but are having issues in Chrome) SO far I have not found any problems with my sites on Chrome. I downloaded Safari and Opera for coding issues only, and use IE for that as well.Chrome is only in its Beta stage, things might change later on, that most of its users might not find it likable. The only way Google Chrome will stay up is because of the Hard Core Google users.

Ravi that our quality was bad Well i just state some facts here and evoeyrne is free to chooseOur Raws: Self scanned HQ RawsTheirs: Raw1st (do i need to tell more)They had a big flaw in their translation stating that the facility was underwater uhm yeah right >.>Our resolution is 1600px height where theirs seems to be around 1200px (not to sure about that)And ofc we did 4 ch in like what? 2 days XDDo i need to say more/kindergarten